Blog

  • Bong Joon Ho, Robert Pattinson tackle sci-fi satire

    Bong Joon Ho, Robert Pattinson tackle sci-fi satire

    play

    An out-of-his mind lighthouse keeper. A brooding vampire. A small-time criminal. Batman.

    Robert Pattinson has played so many roles that it inspired Korean director Bong Joon Ho to cast him as multiple versions of the same dude – 18 of them, in fact – in a followup to the filmmaker’s Oscar-winning “Parasite.”

    In the dark sci-fi comedy “Mickey 17” (in theaters Friday), Pattinson plays Mickey Barnes, a guy who owes money to the wrong people and tries to leave Earth ASAP. He signs up to be an “expendable” on a colonizing expedition to an ice planet, but never reads the fine print: Mickey becomes a lowly worker who’s regularly put in ultra-hazardous situations, and when he dies, a new Mickey is printed out with a high-tech machine and discarded organic material, with all his memories intact. Over and over and over again.

    Join our Watch Party! Sign up to receive USA TODAY’s movie and TV recommendations right in your inbox.

    On one mission, Mickey 17 is left for dead but is saved by the planet’s indigenous species. He’s rescued and runs into Mickey 18, which causes all sorts of political, personal and existential issues for the underdog hero.

    Watching Pattinson in “The Lighthouse,” “I could just see the madness in his eyes in that performance, and that’s exactly what I wanted for Mickey 18,” Bong says through a translator. Pattinson’s superhero in “The Batman” is “different from Mickey in every single way, but there was this strange sense of melancholy to that character. His version of Batman just constantly was blaming himself. I thought that could resonate with Mickey, in some ways.”

    “Mickey 17” examines themes of identity and colonialism, but in adapting Edward Ashton’s 2022 novel “Mickey7,” Bong was most attracted to exploring Mickey as a sad character who’s been printed more than a dozen times. It’s “presented as this advanced technology, but if you think about it, it’s kind of tragic, ridiculous and cruel, all at the same time,” the director says. “And in the middle of it is Mickey and all the struggles and turmoils that he goes through in those circumstances.

    “His story felt very much like a journey of him recovering his selfhood (and) his self-esteem, maturing into reclaiming his own humanity.”

    Pattinson thought it was an intriguing role, someone with no self-worth haunted his whole life by thinking he caused the accident that killed his mom by pushing a button in their car when he was a little boy. “I found it this fascinating thing to think, when you have a 5-year-old’s mentality, ‘I pressed the button and then my mom died and then my life turned (bad) afterwards,’” he says. “You get 20 years in the future and there’s so many things tangled up in your mind and it becomes more and more true the more things that go wrong.”

    But every Mickey is a little different: Co-worker/girlfriend Nasha (Naomi Ackie) calls 17 “mild Mickey” and 18 “habanero Mickey.” The latter is essentially a misprint because when the scientists are printing him out, one of them trips and dislodges one of the cables on the machine, so “18 comes out completely insane, basically,” Pattinson says. “It’s almost like he knows he’s only got a little bit of time on the planet and wants to live it up as much as he can and basically just exists to teach 17 a lesson, in a lot of ways.”

    Bong joked among fellow filmmakers that “if this film were to be turned into a Netflix series, each Mickey would have his own episode and the episode would begin with the new iteration coming out of the printer,” he says. The film offers glimpses of some old Mickeys – Nos. 12 through 16 die in vaccine trials during a zippy montage ― while others are mentioned in passing: No. 6 is the annoying and clingy one.

    “He can only process each individual Mickey as a separate being to himself because it’s like, you are not human anymore. You’re literally made out of trash,” Pattinson says.  “He has empathy for all these previous incarnations of himself. It’s just a way of him dealing with the sort of awful situation he’s got himself in. Instead of saying, ‘Oh my God, I’m having a total existential crisis,’ it’s like, ‘No, that was my older brother Mickey 3 who existed three months ago.’”

    The human printing machine itself symbolizes the film’s “tone and manner,” Bong says. “Despite having this fancy printer and going on colony expeditions, humans are still as pathetic (and) foolish as they are now making the same mistakes.” Looking like a souped-up MRI, it was designed to perform like an inkjet printer from the 1990s.

    A Mickey moves in and out, in and out in jittery motion while being printed, and Bong says he had “a lot of fun” playing with the switch that controlled Pattinson coming out of the machine.

    In those scenes, “you feel very much like a guinea pig,” Pattinson says. He let a stuntman take over when a Mickey falls out of the printer and onto the floor ― “It’s actually quite complicated to flop out onto your head” ― and didn’t love trying to act unconscious while steel rollers pinched his butt.

    On one printing day, Pattinson recalls a new background actor getting an unfortunate job: “They’re like, ‘OK, we want to do a closeup where you’re putting a pipe up Rob’s ass.’ The guy just looked so deeply uncomfortable doing it. I’m sort of sitting there like, ’It’s OK, man, just jam it up there,’ ” he adds, laughing. “It was a real character forming experience.”

  • The glass block’s super sexy comeback

    The glass block’s super sexy comeback

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

    NYC, where I live, is a city built in large part from glass. It’s not the famed sheet-glass skyscrapers that catch my eye, though, but something more mundane: the patchwork of glass blocks embedded, unceremoniously, into building facades across town. Glass blocks proliferated globally during the 20th century before falling from fashion, making them today as ubiquitous as they are unloved. And yet this past year, in homes from Kansas City to Kreuzberg, the humble glass block is making a clear comeback. 

    Patented by Swiss engineer Gustave Falconnier in 1886, the original glass blocks were faceted to allow filtered light into factories. In the 1920s, with the Art Deco and Bauhaus movements’ fixation on geometry, glass blocks became a mainstay of residential architecture. This period was so bananas for blocks that entire buildings, such as Pierre Chareau’s Maison de Verre, were constructed from them. Then, after fading from fashion mid-century, blocks resurfaced in the 1980s, becoming newly synonymous with that era’s oversaturated, Miami Vice aesthetic — equal parts seedy and sexy. This bad reputation has plagued them ever since.

    Pierre Chareau’s Maison de Verre, Paris, 1928-1931 © Bridgeman Images

    Glass blocks are, today, the Marmite of building materials, inspiring both love and hate. Abby Happel, a Chicago-based architect, is in the former camp. “I have a thing for buildings with glass blocks,” she says, explaining how last year, this obsession led her to create @sexyglassblock, an Instagram account cataloguing archival and contemporary examples. “Sometimes I have to ask myself: do I actually like this building? Or does it just have a glass block in it?”

    While the page’s posts can amass more than 250,000 likes, initially the feedback was polarised. “Most responses were from people saying they hated glass blocks, that they reminded them of their grandma’s house,” she says. “Well, maybe your grandma has better taste than you.”

    This bygone association is precisely what drew designer Madelynn Hudson to use glass blocks in a recent Kansas City renovation. The guest bathroom features a partition constructed from alpha glass blocks, which have a circular motif embedded within the block’s square. When stacked, this style of block creates a plane evoking a sheet of bubble wrap. “The geometric repetition — it’s pure Deco,” Hudson says. “History repeats itself, and we’re now experiencing an Art Deco revival. We’re in the 1920s again, after all.”

    A low, neatly made bed with simple bedding and a wooden headboard sits on a beige rug. To the side, there is a small table adorned with a vase of flowers. On the left, a glass block partition separates the bedroom from another area
    The showroom of ceramicist and designer Danny Kaplan © William Jess Laird
    a minimalist bathroom whose centrepiece is a bathtub with a front wall constructed of frosted glass blocks
    Rendering of light-diffusing glass blocks in Habita House, Australia, by Studio Beck

    But the glass block’s 1980s connection is equally compelling for Hudson. “People are afraid of glass blocks because of how cost-effective they are, and so how overused they became,” she says, adding that the material’s relative affordability is an asset with today’s rising construction costs. 

    “Were there some gaudy things happening in the 1980s? Oh, of course. But we have enough distance from that decade now to really see the interesting and cool design elements,” she says. “We’re coming out of a period of organic minimalism,” she adds. “That preference is giving way to a desire for something more eventful, expressive and bold.”

    A plush, curved sectional sofa upholstered in deep burgundy fabric and glass tables sit along a curved glass-block wall
    Glass-block wall in the living room of an apartment in Berlin’s Kreuzberg neighbourhood, by Studio Karhard © Robert Rieger

    The geometric uniformity attracted ceramicist and designer Danny Kaplan to use them in his newly completed Manhattan home and showroom, designed alongside architect Peter Martin of Ashe Leandro. “Their grid-like pattern juxtaposes beautifully with the organic forms of my ceramics,” says Kaplan. He opted for Doric glass blocks, which feature wide vertical ribbing that underscores the material’s clean lines. This more singular style of block, rather than the rippled-water Nubio style overplayed in the last century, ensures the space feels contemporary.

    Glass blocks are, in fact, the first thing visitors to Kaplan’s home-slash-showroom encounter. As elevator doors open into the space, diaphanous glass-block partitions create an intimate foyer. Blocks are used in this way throughout the space, segmenting the open-plan loft without making it feel dark. “They delineate spaces in a visually open way,” Kaplan says. “The translucency adds a luminous quality to the interiors, filtering natural light while maintaining an element of privacy.”

    a three-story residence or institutional building, featuring a prominent use of glass blocks in the middle section
    The Villa Stenersen, Oslo, by Arne Korsmo, 1937-39 © Nasjonalmuseet/Annar Bjørgli
    a retro-style bathroom whose walls are tiled in a soft green hue. There is a pair of pedestal sinks. A window in the centre of the wall framed by frosted glass blocks
    The bathroom © Nasjonalmuseet/Annar Bjørgli

    Architecture practice Flack Studio is likewise captivated by the visual qualities of glass blocks. “Thanks to their chunkiness, they reflect light in a super dynamic way,” says founder David Flack. For a recent Melbourne project, Flack constructed exterior walls from glass blocks. “A flat glass panel has a direct relationship with the landscape, whereas the glass block is much more abstract, distorting the view,” he says. “It invites your imagination to fill in the gaps between what you can see and what you want to see.”

    Recent manufacturing developments have introduced a new breed of glass blocks with enhanced thermal insulation and energy efficiency, akin to your classic double-glazed unit. For Flack, the glass block is chic without sacrificing sustainability.

    A building features two curved barrel-vaulted roofs made of glass blocks. The structure is elevated slightly above ground and surrounded by greenery,  with a calm reflecting pool in the foreground
    Glass House in Pirque, Chile, by Max Núñez (2018) © Roland Halbe

    It’s not just the material itself that’s evolving, but the way designers are approaching it. In a residential project by Studio Beck on Australia’s Gold Coast, for example, glass blocks form the igloo-like structure of a bathtub. For an apartment in Berlin’s Kreuzberg neighbourhood, meanwhile, architecture practice Studio Karhard created a glass-block wall in the living room, backlit by programmable LED panels.

    Glass blocks are well suited for innovative application, says Karhard co-founder Thomas Karsten: “It’s a very old material that has a futuristic quality. It works as well today as it did 100 years ago.”

    Find out about our latest stories first — follow @ft_houseandhome on Instagram

  • Premiere date, cast, where to watch, stream

    Premiere date, cast, where to watch, stream

    play

    “The Amazing Race” is back for its most jam packed adventure in the show’s nearly 25 year run.

    Season 37 of the Emmy-winning reality competition series hosted by Phil Keoghan will follow 14 duos traveling across the world, the largest cast in the show’s history, all vying for the $1 million prize.

    Though the goal of each team has always been simple – to not be last – the journey is anything but. Competitors must overcome mental and physical challenges at various Pit Stops in order to learn their next location. The teams that are last to reach the Pit Stop will gradually be eliminated with each episode.

    The Season 37 cast’s first stop will be in Hong Kong, where the contestants will learn a surprise twist that forces them to choose which direction and route they want to take, CBS confirmed. The twist will create two parallel races where two teams will be eliminated at separate pit stops.

    Here’s what to know about Season 37 of “The Amazing Race.”

    When does ‘The Amazing Race’ Season 37 premiere?

    The new season features 90-minute episodes, including the premiere, which airs Wednesday, March 5 at 9:30 p.m. EDT/PDT on CBS and streaming on Paramount+.

    Subscribe to Paramount+ to watch “The Amazing Race”

    How to watch ‘The Amazing Race’

    New episodes of “The Amazing Race” Season 37 will air Wednesday nights at 9:30 p.m. EDT/PDT on CBS and streaming on Paramount+.

    New episodes will be available to stream the day after the episode airs and on-demand on Paramount+ with Showtime subscribers, or on demand for Paramount+ Essential subscribers. The first 36 seasons are also available on the streaming platform.

    ‘The Amazing Race’ 2025 cast

    “The Amazing Race” Season 37 will feature the following teams of two:

    • Alyssa Borden and Josiah Borden: Married couple
    • Bernie Gutierrez and Carrigain Scadden: Friends
    • Brett Hamby and Mark Romain: Married couple
    • Carson McCalley and Jack Dodge: Best friends
    • Courtney Ramsey and Jasmin Carey: Dating
    • Ernest Cato and Bridget Cato: Father and daughter
    • Han Nguyen and Holden Nguyen: Siblings
    • Jackye Clayton and Lauren McKinney: Sisters
    • Jonathan Towns and Ana Towns: Married couple
    • Mark Crawford and Larry Graham: Best friends
    • Melinda Papadeas and Erika Papadeas :Mother and daughter
    • Nick Fiorito and Mike Fiorito: Brothers
    • Jeff ‘Pops’ Bailey and Jeff Bailey: Father and son
    • Scott Thompson and Lori Thompson: Married couple

    Who won ‘Amazing Race’ Season 36?

    New York City couple Ricky Rotandi and César Aldrete won Season 36 of “The Amazing Race.”

    Rotandi is a preschool teacher and Aldrete is a chef. The pair won seven of the 11 legs and came in second place three times.

    Best friends Juan Villa and Shane Bilek ultimately came in second place, while married couple Rod and Leticia Gardner came in third.

    Contributing: Haadiza Ogwude, Cincinnati Enquirer

    We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.

  • Architecton film review — documentary where rock is the star

    Architecton film review — documentary where rock is the star

    Stay informed with free updates

    Russian documentarist Victor Kossakovsky has worked on the very largest scales, and some of the smallest. In his intimate mode, he has made a film studying the view from the window of his flat, while 2020’s extraordinary Gunda offered a close-up portrait of a sow and her litter. At the other end of the spectrum was Aquarela (2018), a quasi-symphonic musing on the various manifestations of water on our planet.

    Now in similarly maximalist mode comes Architecton, a largely wordless study of stone. This imagistic essay muses on the problem of man-made structures now and through history, and the urgency of rethinking the art of building when there is only so much natural material left to exploit.

    Architecton begins by contemplating destruction, using drone photography to provide sweeping vistas of buildings shelled by Russia in Ukraine or destroyed during the Turkish earthquakes of 2023. Then we contemplate the sheer power of substance, in the form of a colossal stone block in the ruins of Baalbek in Lebanon — a mass that one can barely imagine human machineries ever having manipulated.

    The film then becomes a rhapsody to pure materiality, as the camera glides over stone surfaces and contemplates endless slow cascades of rock down the slopes of a quarry, and boulders pulverised in the grinding machineries of a gravel crusher. Through the remarkable clarity of Ben Bernhard’s photography — so precise that at one point, your attention is caught by a tiny ant scuttling along a slab of masonry — gazing at the real becomes akin to a hallucinatory science-fiction experience. Sequences in black and white show an abandoned town reclaimed by nature, its surfaces and surrounding vegetation bleached out like bone or chalk.

    The film contemplates destruction such as that caused by the 2023 earthquakes in Turkey

    Interludes in a more everyday register show Italian architect Michele De Lucchi — himself resembling a visitor from antiquity, bearded like an Attic sage — as he supervises the laying of a circle of stones in his garden. In the film’s epilogue, he and Kossakovsky contemplate the problem of architecture now and in the future. How can we build, De Lucchi asks, with material that is not fated to become garbage? What does it mean that humanity once made structures that endured a thousand years but now makes them to last only decades? The architect ruefully confesses his guilt at working on a building to be made from concrete, a material that he regards as “arid”. Indeed, it is through the manufacture of concrete that we have been watching mountains reduced gradually to rubble and dust.

    On one level, Architecton is a semi-abstract reverie on a very material topic; with its often ceremonial-sounding music by Evgueni Galperine, it somewhat recalls Godfrey Reggio’s much-loved “state of humanity” documentary Koyaanisqatsi. Certainly there is a slight flavour of the grandiosely sententious — and the opening images of destruction could be accused of aestheticising catastrophe. But there is also a serious philosophical and environmental inquiry at work here, regarding our future and the urgent need to reinvent the way we make the spaces we inhabit.

    ★★★★☆

    In UK cinemas from January 10

  • Jennifer Hudson hit in face at Knicks game, Common protects her

    Jennifer Hudson hit in face at Knicks game, Common protects her

    play

    Jennifer Hudson’s latest basketball game outing wasn’t exactly a common one for her.

    The “Dreamgirls” star, 43, seemed to have her glasses knocked off after a basketball flew directly at her head while she was sitting courtside at a New York Knicks game on Tuesday with her boyfriend, Common.

    The incident occurred after Knicks player Miles McBride attempted to grab the ball, which was knocked forward toward Hudson. Common, who was sitting next to Hudson, reacted quickly and put his hand out in an attempt to block the ball.

    It wasn’t totally clear whether the ball made contact with Hudson or whether Common’s hand blocked it in time. But either way, footage from the game showed Hudson looking frazzled in the aftermath of the incident. Common put his arm around her as she examined her glasses, which did not appear to be damaged.

    “Protect Jennifer Hudson!” one commentator exclaimed on the broadcast, while another observed that her glasses looked “real expensive.”

    USA TODAY has reached out to representatives for Hudson.

    Hudson has been spotted at Knicks games with Common before, and she performed at an NBA All-Star game in 2024.

    Hudson and Common slyly confirmed their relationship in a January 2024 episode of her talk show. In an interview, the rapper revealed he was dating an unnamed woman who has “an EGOT” and won “an Oscar on her first movie,” clearly referring to Hudson. She said that she was “very happy” in her relationship, while not explicitly saying it was with Common, while he said that “this relationship is a happy place for me.”

    In October, Common appeared on Hudson’s talk show again and doubled down on a previous statement that “if I should be married, it would be to” her. She replied, “I support that idea. I think it’s a beautiful idea!”

  • a surprising, stunning gem of urban architecture

    a surprising, stunning gem of urban architecture

    Bahrain’s Pearling Path is not quite like anything I’ve seen before. It is a landmark cultural project in the Gulf that privileges carefulness and thoughtfulness over spectacle. It is a project in which the streetlamps and the benches built for the local community are as beautifully considered as the museums, historic restorations and concert venues. It is, in short, a wonderful surprise. 

    Bahrain, a small kingdom on an island between Qatar and Saudi Arabia, has largely eschewed the excesses of Gulf brashness. Its capital Manama is a busy, functional, late-20th-century but slightly shabby city.

    Just over a short stretch of water is Muharraq, the nation’s original capital, home to migrant workers and the working classes, and a very different city of tight, shady streets and alleys staggered to encourage breezes and to break up the hot winds. And it is here that the Pearling Path has been established, a winding, 2.2-mile trail through backstreets, alleys and courtyards that ties together some new and some old attractions, designed and restored with care and intelligence, each reflecting on the pearl fishing and trading that was once the city’s main source of wealth. 

    The route begins at the water and meanders through tightly knit neighbourhoods in something that looks very different from the new cultural quarter destinations we’ve become accustomed to. Rather, this route is punctuated by mostly modest, often surprising, occasionally stunning architectural moments. It is a quite brilliant piece of urban acupuncture.

    The old city of Muharraq, with two of the new Pearling Path structures © Iwan Baan
    The facade of a modern building with contrasting planes of sheet glass, flat concrete and rough-edged corners
    The restored and remodelled Suq al-Qaysariya market © Studio Anne Holtrop

    At its heart is the Siyadi Complex, a collection of buildings that includes the house of an old pearl-trading family and once the tallest building in Muharraq. It encompasses the beautifully restored interiors of the dwelling, as well as a small mosque, a complex network of courtyards and the newly created Pearl Museum, a cool, raw space with a pearlescent interior designed by Anne Holtrop.

    Holtrop, an urbane and affable Dutch architect who has made Muharraq his home, is also responsible for the restoration and partial rebuilding of the Suq al-Qaysariya marketplace, which once functioned as the pearling place of exchange but had become rundown from use. Holtrop’s interventions are raw and robust, maintaining the workmanlike character of the neighbourhood, introducing deep, shady eaves and creating a street-level layer of gnarly concrete that evokes the mud and earth of the old city. His own office is here too, in a once burnt-out warehouse amid the restored arcades.

    A number of other older houses with their distinctive forms, stark exterior walls and tall wind-catching towers are dotted along the path, each restored and made public, each a potential cultural or community venue.

    One of the first of the Pearling Path’s completed structures was the Dar Al Muharraq, a vertical extension to an existing structure by Belgian architects Office Kersten Geers David Van Severen. This enigmatic building appears draped in a steel mesh veil, a little like chainmail, ruched at its bottom edges like a curtain that is theatrically lifted when an event is taking place inside. Reserved mostly for musical performance (particularly the mesmeric, dirge-like folk music of the pearl fishers), the building’s glass panels also open out to allow the breeze to flow in and the music to trickle out. It is, unusually, a modest and highly dramatic piece of public architecture.

    A three-storey building, glimpsed down a narrow alley, covered in a veil of steel mesh
    The Dar Al Muharraq seems draped in a mesh veil ruched at the bottom like . . . © Bas Princen
    The same three-storey building with the bottom of the steel veil mesh lifted to reveal red door and window frames at street level
    . . . a curtain that is theatrically lifted when an event takes place inside © Bas Princen

    Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

    Along the route there are other, smaller public buildings, half-hidden and easy to miss while exploring more of the history of pearling and the small city itself. But perhaps the most surprising and inspiring aspect of this intervention is its attitude to public space.

    A landscape strategy led by Belgian office Bureau Bas Smets (currently working on the designs for the landscaping outside Notre-Dame in Paris) alongside Holtrop is characterised by the creation of a handful of small new public spaces scattered along the path and meant for locals. When I visited, there were lads playing football and older people sitting and chatting on the new curving stone benches. If the institutions might be meant for tourists, these spaces were resolutely designed for the working-class inhabitants of Muharraq itself. It is determinedly not a project about gentrification.

    The public route is defined by a coherent language of street furniture, something almost always neglected in urban design and relegated to an afterthought or value-engineered out at the last minute. Here streetlamps are designed like lollipops with translucent shades (reminiscent, of course, of pearls) and concrete columns in which sparkle little fragments of mother of pearl in the aggregate.

    Street trees are placed, like the lights, exactly on the junctions of large pavers that themselves evoke a kind of carpet defining the edges of the space. Even the bins have been beautifully considered in the same cylindrical concrete language as the street lights. The coherence of the street furniture allows you to follow the trail, picking up on the breadcrumbs of bins, benches and lights, without ever making it too explicit or exclusive, so that this does not feel like an imposition on a neighbourhood but an enhancement of routes to make you look at the city.

    An artist’s impression of a small town square with sapling trees, a curved bench and streetlights with pearl-like spherical lamps
    Al Dana Square, one of the public spaces along the Pearling Path © Iwan Baan
    A street view shows a few cars driving past a modern structure of curving roofs. Close by are streetlights with pearl-like lamps; in the distance is the tower of a mosque
    A street view along the Pearling Path. On the right is one of the parking structures by Christian Kerez © Iwan Baan

    If there is a mis-step, it is perhaps that the exquisite modesty of a meandering walk is contained by four humongous parking garages at its corners. Designed by Swiss architect Christian Kerez, these are remarkable structures in their own right — sculptural forms in which ramps wrap around and create public platforms in the air. But they are also out of place and out of scale, odd in a scheme that is all about the complexities and encounters of walking, such a rarity in the Gulf. 

    The final building on the route (or the first, depending on how you approach it) is another out-of-scale blockbuster — but one that works, I think. Designed by Swiss architect Valerio Olgiati, this gateway/grand finale consists of a vast concrete canopy creating a sort of shaded space beneath it but refusing to define what it might be for.

    At its heart is an exhibition hall, austere and bunker-like, but mostly this is just covered space. It reminded me of the kind of thing that might have been erected in the 1970s over an archaeological site (and it does, indeed, turn out to be covering some bulky but missable ruins of warehouses) or perhaps an abandoned megastructure in the Iraqi desert. You might criticise the sheer amount of concrete here, the hundreds of tonnes of embodied carbon just to create a canopy, but, with its odd perforated roof (holes in the shape of houses) and chimney-like towers, it is a thing of powerfully enigmatic urban presence.

    A shaded courtyard surrounded by whitewashed walls, with wooden doors and shutters. In the centre is a modern stainless steel drinking fountain
    The courtyard of the Al Alawi House © Iwan Baan
    A structure of muted grey-brown colour with a flat roof punctuated by tall pillars and gaps through which sky is visible
    The route’s first (or final) building, designed by Valerio Olgiati, is a vast concrete canopy creating a shaded space beneath

    In its entirety and complexity this is a remarkable work of urban intervention and its genesis can be traced to a single remarkable figure, Noura Al Sayeh. An architect-turned-client who now works for Bahrain’s Authority for Culture and Antiquities, she turned the project into something surprising and in many ways exemplary. That she is also now married to Holtrop, who moved to be with her in Bahrain, might be noted — they met and married during the process.

    It is not often that a group of wildly disparate architects are brought together to create something coherent. This could have been a blockbuster cultural quarter or a ragged collection of discrete monuments, but it has turned into something very different indeed. I struggle to think of a better and more thoughtful example of culture and architecture being used to enhance identity and improve everyday life rather than just create a new, generic attraction. You may not find yourself in Bahrain often, but if you do, it’d be a terrible omission not to take a couple of hours or so to indulge in following this remarkable path.

    Find out about our latest stories first — follow FT Weekend on Instagram and X, and sign up to receive the FT Weekend newsletter every Saturday morning

  • The world’s best house museums

    The world’s best house museums

    The world’s best house museums

  • Dolly Parton’s husband Carl Dean inspired song ‘Jolene’

    Dolly Parton’s husband Carl Dean inspired song ‘Jolene’

    play

    Dolly Parton’s husband Carl Thomas Dean, who has died at age 82, helped birth one of the most iconic songs of her career.

    The country music star, 79, has explained that her 1973 hit “Jolene,” in which she begs the beautiful title woman not to take her man, was inspired by a real bank teller’s interactions with her husband.

    “She got this terrible crush on my husband,” Parton told NPR in 2008. “And he just loved going to the bank because she paid him so much attention. It was kinda like a running joke between us — when I was saying, ‘Hell, you’re spending a lot of time at the bank. I don’t believe we’ve got that kind of money.’ So it’s really an innocent song all around, but sounds like a dreadful one.”

    Parton told “60 Minutes Australia” this occurred after she and Dean first got married in 1966.

    Watch Dolly Parton perform hit song ‘Jolene’

    Lyrics to ‘Jolene’ by Dolly Parton sparked by young fan

    The name Jolene, though, had a different origin. Parton revealed to NPR that she once signed an autograph for a “beautiful little” 8-year-old girl named Jolene, and the name stood out to her.

    “She had this beautiful red hair, this beautiful skin, these beautiful green eyes, and she was looking up at me, holding, you know, for an autograph,” Parton told NPR. “I said, ‘Well, you’re the prettiest little thing I ever saw. So what is your name?’ And she said, ‘Jolene.’ And I said, ‘Jolene. Jolene. Jolene. Jolene.’ I said, ‘That is pretty. That sounds like a song. I’m going to write a song about that.’”

    In the song, Parton sings that Jolene’s “beauty is beyond compare” and tells her, “I’m begging of you, please don’t take my man … Please don’t take him just because you can.””

    ‘Jolene’ covers, from Beyoncé to Miley Cyrus

    Since its release in 1973, “Jolene” has been covered by numerous artists, from Miley Cyrus to The White Stripes.

    Beyoncé’s 2024 album “Cowboy Carter” also included a cover of the track. Parton appeared on the album in an interlude prior to the “Jolene” cover, saying, “You know that hussy with the good hair you sing about? Reminded me of someone I knew back when. Except she has flaming locks of auburn hair.” But the Beyoncé version tweaked the lyrics to “Jolene,” including changing “I’m begging of you please don’t take my man” to “I’m warnin’ you, don’t come for my man.”

    Parton reacted to the cover at the time by writing on Instagram, “Wow, I just heard ‘Jolene.’ Beyoncé is giving that girl some trouble and she deserves it!” She previously told Knox News that she and Beyoncé have “sent messages back and forth through the years,” adding, “I always thought she was great.”

    Dolly Parton’s husband Carl Dean dies

    Parton confirmed on Monday that Dean, who was notoriously private during his marriage to the singer, has died. The couple did not have any children together.

    “Carl and I spent many wonderful years together,” Parton said in a statement. “Words can’t do justice to the love we shared for over 60 years. Thank you for your prayers and sympathy.”

    Contributing: Liz Kellar, Knoxville News Sentinel

  • John McAslan’s house of two halves

    John McAslan’s house of two halves

    “We wanted to create an enfilade and I should use that word sparingly for want of sounding pretentious, but it’s like creating streams so you get the width, depth and full use of the spaces,” smiles architect John McAslan describing the masterplan behind the renovation of his Victorian home in south-west London. “It really is a pull of energy, to move you through from the front door to the garden,” adds his wife, Dava Sagenkahn, dressed in vibrant Issey Miyake Pleats Please.

    The journey – or enfilade – through the McAslan home, situated on a leafy, residential street, begins at a knee-height bespoke wooden gate. This unusual design is the initial welcome into the expansive, expressive interior that lies beyond the front door. 

    The front of the house, with the bespoke wooden gate © Michael Sinclair
    A modern glass window in the entrance hall looks on to the side return; the floor tiling is original 19th century
    A modern glass window in the entrance hall looks on to the side return; the floor tiling is original 19th century © Michael Sinclair
    A Vitra table in the garden room
    A Vitra table in the garden room © Michael Sinclair

    The hallway, with original geometric period tiling, features an oblique, narrow glass window that frames an olive tree planted in an external side return. On the left, it bursts open into a living area, and straight ahead segues into a big kitchen that swings out perpendicularly into a dining area with a vast Vitra table. A wall of sliding glass garden doors filters light across the entire ground floor.

    Scotsman McAslan, who founded John McAslan+ Partners in 1993, is a pioneer of intervention and preservation – an architectural approach that favours repurposing (rather than demolishing) old buildings. His multi-award-winning practice is behind some of the most impressive transport hubs in the world including King’s Cross Station, Sydney Metro’s Central Station, the upgrade of Penn Station in New York and Bond Street station on the  Elizabeth Line, alongside residential towers, education centres and museums such as the revamped The Burrell Collection in his home city of Glasgow. While different, each project is underpinned by human-centric architecture that improves the quality of urban life.

    Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

    When it came to conceiving this house, the McAslans were not interested in statement-making grandeur but in creating a beautiful environment in which to live, love, think and work. For John, the methodology is the same. “It was about transforming the old into new, which is what a lot of the work of the practice is about. We wanted to open it up, retain what we could, set a budget and develop a language of architecture and design that was an expression of us,” he says. “The central idea here was to get the energy of the house circulating front to back and retain, remodel and upcycle what existed to varying degrees – we had an ecological, fabric-first approach.”  

    A petal table by designer Jorge Zalszupin in one of the ground floor spaces
    A petal table by designer Jorge Zalszupin in one of the ground floor spaces © Michael Sinclair
    The private sitting room that connects to the master bedroom
    The private sitting room that connects to the master bedroom © Michael Sinclair

    Since the early 1980s, the couple lived in four different properties in Notting Hill. As John was building his business, Dava was working in recruitment while raising three children, Hannah, Flossy and Renwick, who have now all left home. There was no urgency to move, rather a gentle yearning for more light, sky and a sense of expansiveness, which is hard to find in the densely occupied city.  

    Moving south of the river was not on the agenda until their daughter Hannah, a lawyer who lives in the area, spotted the property and went for a recce, iPhone in hand. She sent the video to John and Dava who were on holiday at their restored farm south of Florence. They swiftly put in an offer. “We’ve never done that before. We’re normally forensic,” laughs Dava of the almost blind bid and the serendipitous events that landed them the keys. 

    The kitchen island
    The kitchen island © Michael Sinclair
    A view through the kitchen to the garden
    A view through the kitchen to the garden © Michael Sinclair

    The core renovation with the construction company Davies & Daughters involved knocking down walls, opening up all the spaces, building out into the garden and ripping out a “circus tent” conservatory. “It was an awful octagonal makeshift ’70s one – boiling in the summer and leaky in the rain,” says John, rolling his intense blue eyes. It was reconfigured into a punched-out space that now frames a small kidney-shaped garden landscaped by Jack Newlyn and enclaved by bamboo and neighbouring trees. 

    The first floor hosts John and Dava’s bedroom, a private sitting room and an emerald-Bisazza-tiled en suite bathroom with a curvilinear wall. The top floor houses two super-size flexible sleep-living spaces for guests and family, with extended eaves that create new volumes and light. The upstairs bathrooms are vivid lime green “cubes” with a painted floor, ceiling and wall in the same wake-me-up hue. “The layout of the house is clear and direct, with flexibility: the ground floor is entirely open, engaging the hall, reception spaces, extended kitchen, garden room and fully opening into and through the garden,” says John, who admits he has an aversion to rooms with closed doors. “The first floor is our apartment, and the top floor is a suite of connected spaces that can open or close as needs be.” “I feel I can use every room,” says Dava. “There are times when I take my laptop and go all the way up to the top of the house and it’s just great.” 

    Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

    There were a few trouble spots, including a damp, rotting cellar that required gutting and fixing to make way for a utility area. “How we avoided electrocution, I don’t know!” says Dava of the early renovation. They moved in permanently in March 2024. Perhaps unusually, the couple were aligned on pretty much all aspects, including the wood-panelled walls and simple single strips of shelving (by John Cherrington of Windmill Furniture) that feature throughout. The Strong White (Farrow & Ball) wall paint changes with the light, accented by breezy voile curtains, citrus-green blinds (that beam optimism from the street view) and the wide oak floorboards.  

    The couple first met in the late 1970s in Boston at the canteen of the architectural practice Cambridge Seven Associates, where John had just landed an internship as a recent graduate from Edinburgh University. Dava was working as an executive assistant to one of the partners. It was a coup de foudre. “I said to myself, well, I’m going to marry her. This was she! So I stayed my year and I think on the last day I asked you out or something,” smiles John, who returned to London to work at Richard Rogers and rack up a phone bill calling his sweetheart. A transatlantic courtship ensued before Dava moved to the UK in 1981 and they wed. “Not really knowing each other, but enough to know,” laughs Dava. “This was not anything I ever planned when I was burning my bra with my feminist sisters: a, to get married; or b, to marry someone I didn’t know very well.”


    The couple share a love of adventure, travel, family and collecting that is writ large in their collection of furniture, art and artefacts. The cane and teak furniture is a combination of original armchairs designed by Pierre Jeanneret for Chandigarh in the 1950s, with a number of pieces recently made by Phillips Antiques in India in reclaimed teak. The wooden screens by Artek were designed by Alvar Aalto in 1936, and they own a standout Brazilian petal table by Jorge Zalszupin from the 1960s. “We dressed the interiors with an array of panelled wall assemblies – some open and some closed – for our library. The artefacts, collected over time and very personal to us, express our journey individually and as a family,” says Dava.

    One of the upstairs bathrooms, decorated by their daughter Flossy
    One of the upstairs bathrooms, decorated by their daughter Flossy © Michael Sinclair
    A handmade rug by Shyam Ahuja in India
    A handmade rug by Shyam Ahuja in India © Michael Sinclair
    Glassware and ceramics on the glass-topped coffee table
    Glassware and ceramics on the glass-topped coffee table © Michael Sinclair

    There is a luminescent collection of Bakelite pieces (many found in Martha’s Vineyard) perched on cabinets; a vintage Missoni rug alongside colourful abstract floor coverings, some sketched by John and handwoven by Shyam Ahuja in Mumbai. The artworks, casually leaning on the narrow shelves and coursing up the stairwells, range from an exquisite sketch of two female bottoms by their daughter Flossy (John swears it is better than Klimt) to contemporary Indian abstract painters, and a very early American 1869 Shield, Eagle and Flags stamp (one of a series purchased for their children) to celebrate Dava’s US roots.

    By contrast, there are photographic works by the Indian artist Raghu Rai, alongside Wolfgang Tillmans and Simon Starling. The couple are patrons of emerging artists and the collection is diverse, esoteric and autobiographical – with many humorous anecdotes attached. “We began collecting around 40 years ago when we first married, starting with Peter Blake’s pencil studies of a lady’s bottom made in 1955 when he was a student at the RCA. From there we focused on European expressionists like Paul Klee, Jean Metzinger, Erich Mendelsohn, Marc Chagall, Sonia Delaunay and Giorgio Morandi,” says John. They also share a love of abstract Indian painters including Ram Kumar, Tyeb Mehta and Francis Newton Souza – a founding member of the Progressive Artists’ Group.

    The master bedroom
    The master bedroom © Michael Sinclair
    John McAslan and Dava Sagenkahn in the garden room that opens on to the terrace
    John McAslan and Dava Sagenkahn in the garden room that opens on to the terrace © Michael Sinclair

    The duo are strong believers in community and in preservation. In 2010, they fundraised £3.5mn with the local community in Argyll to save Dunoon Burgh Hall, an 1874 arts venue in the seaside town of Dunoon, where John grew up. The building was in danger of being torn down, so they bought it for £1. It is now a thriving cultural hub and there are plans to establish a library and archive centre with their vast collection (around 2,500) of architectural and art books. McAslan is also lobbying the GLA and central government as part of a Social and Affordable Housing Initiative calling for the adaptive reuse of redundant “grey belt” office space (estimated at 24mn sq ft) as a sustainable alternative to the push for new-build homes.  

    One of the biggest eye-openers for John is the newfound joy of crossing the Thames en route to work. “I think of the Kinks and ‘Waterloo Sunset’, romantic meetings and all that stuff. But the big change is having that distance between work and home,” he says. Not to mention the novelty of using the Overground and Underground. “When he first got on the train, we thought he might not come back!” says Dava. But now both have the pleasure of coming home through an elegant front gate. Four neighbours have already inquired after its provenance. “It is our gate!” they laugh in unison.

  • New details on dogs, health

    New details on dogs, health

    play

    The deaths of Gene Hackman and wife Betsy Arakawa may still be unsolved, but new details about their pets and health are emerging.

    The actor, his pianist wife Arakawa and their dog were found dead by authorities in their Santa Fe, New Mexico, home on Wednesday. 

    According to a search warrant affidavit, authorities found the actor in a mudroom near his cane, appearing to have fallen, while his wife Arakawa was found in an open bathroom near a space heater, with an open prescription bottle and pills scattered on the nearby countertop. A deputy observed Arakawa with “body decomposition, bloating in her face” and mummification of her hands and feet.

    One of the couple’s dogs was also found dead less than 15 feet from Arakawa in a crate, while two other dogs were found alive in the bathroom near Arakawa and outside.

    Here’s what else is new as the investigation continues.

    Search for gas leaks and carbon monoxide results in ‘no significant findings’

    On Tuesday, the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office issued an update based on the New Mexico Gas Company’s “extensive investigation for gas leaks and carbon monoxide at Gene Hackman’s home,” which was conducted the evening of Feb. 26.

    “There were no significant findings. NMGC did issue five (5) red tags. One red tag was for a minuscule leak (0.33% gas in air – not a lethal amount) at one of the stove burners,” the news release states. “The other four red tags were for code enforcement violations -not involving gas leaks or carbon monoxide – involving a water heater and gas log lighters installed in three fireplaces.”

    These results “are not believed to be a factor in the deaths of Gene Hackman, Betsy Arakawa or their dog,” the sheriff’s office noted.

    However, the findings were sent to the Office of the Medical Investigator “for consideration.”

    Gene Hackman cause of death

    The exact cause of death still has not been determined. Authorities have called the circumstances “suspicious,” though a Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office spokesperson said foul play is not suspected. Police are in the process of putting together a timeline of the couple’s deaths, with early reports suggesting the couple could have been dead for over a week.

    Gene Hackman, Betsy Arakawa died with Australian Kelpie mix named Zinna: Exclusive

    USA TODAY has learned that police, in an affidavit for a search warrant, misidentified the dog that the couple died with, which led media to incorrectly report their German shepherd had perished.

    The dog who died in the Hackman home was actually Zinna, a 12-year-old reddish Australian Kelpie mixed-breed who had once trained in agility skills to compete at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show. Her body was found in a closed crate in the home, according to Joey Padilla, who transported the surviving dogs to his facility, Santa Fe Tails. The couple’s surviving dogs are Bear, a German shepherd, and Nikita, a 7-year-old Akita-shepherd mix.

    USA TODAY visited the Santa Fe Animal Shelter, the county agency responsible for housing animals when they are found with deceased owners. Officials there referred all questions to the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office, who said deputies may have just misidentified the breed.

    Gene Hackman’s friends reveal late actor’s health was in decline months before death

    According to family friends Daniel and Barbara Lenihan, Hackman’s condition was “really slipping” in the “last couple of months” before his shocking death, the couple shared with People magazine in an interview published Friday.

    While the Lenihans did not disclose details on Hackman’s failing health, Daniel Lenihan noted that the Oscar-winning actor was “essentially kind of homebound,” with Barbara Lenihan adding that the 95-year-old had stopped riding his bike through their Santa Fe, New Mexico, neighborhood.

    Gene Hackman, Betsy Arakawa rebuilt New Mexico property

    Hackman lived in Santa Fe, New Mexico, for four decades, much of that time in the couple’s remodeled property.

    The “French Connection” actor turned to the city – and a two-story green stucco estate – after retreating from Hollywood. The home blended pueblo, colonial and Spanish baroque styles and was rebuilt from the studs, according to Architectural Digest, with Hackman involved intimately with the design of the home.

    Contributing: Anna Kaufman and KiMi Robinson, USA TODAY